INGHAM ECONOMIC REPORTING
Karr Ingham
P.O. Box 7531 Phone: (806) 373-4814
Amarillo, TX 79114 e-mail: InghamEcon@aol.com Fax: (806) 373-5370
January 31, 2011
The Midland Development Corporation
The Midland-Odessa Regional Economic Index
and the
Texas Permian Basin Petroleum Index
December/4th Quarter/Annual 2011
The year 2011 was clearly a year of economic growth and expansion in the general economy of the combined Midland-Odessa metropolitan area, and of continued recovery from the deep recession of 2009. It also was a year of dramatic expansion in the regional oil & gas economy as oil & gas E&P companies continued to push the envelope, raising activity levels in the Permian Basin to impressive new levels.
The general economy of the Midland-Odessa combined metro area is measured by the Midland-Odessa Regional Economic Index, which finished the year at 172.3 for December, up from 170.7 in November, and up 13.5% from the December 2010 MOREI of 151.8. December 2011 represents the 22nd straight month of expansion in the index, and again, November 2011 marked the month in which the index surpassed its previous peak prior to the onset of recession, which was achieved in December of 2008. Each new month of increase in the MOREI represents the establishment of a new record level of aggregate activity in the Midland-Odessa general economy.
The regional oil & gas economy is measured by the Texas Permian Basin Petroleum Index, which rose in December for the 25th straight month increasing to 281.7 up from 279.9 in November, and up 12.6% from the December 2010 index of 250.2 (which in turn was up over 35% compared to the December 2009 TPBPI). As it turns out, the petroleum index also surpassed its pre-downturn high in November 2011, which had been achieved in September of 2008.
As December marks the end of a quarter, the table of economic indicators for the Midland-Odessa Regional Economic Index contains largely fourth quarter totals/averages, along with the annual totals/averages, with the exception of the employment data which reflects the December monthly estimates along with the annual averages.
And a caveat with regard to the employment data; payroll employment estimates and the labor force/unemployment rate estimates will be revised over the next couple of months beginning with the first release of revised data in early March. As a part of that process, employment estimates in these categories will be revised for 2011, and possibly 2010, and new benchmarks will be established for the monthly estimates going forward in 2012.
The table of economic indicators for the general economy of Midland-Odessa is impressive, with no year-over-year negatives except for the one category in a growing economy that should be lower this year compared to last, and that is the unemployment rate. The economy as represented by these various indicators grew impressively in 2011, and the numbers reflect extraordinary increases in many cases.
General real spending is at the top of that list. A critical local economic indicator, inflation-adjusted taxable spending by households and businesses is a virtually failsafe measure of cyclical expansion and contraction in the local economy. In the fourth quarter alone, spending was up by over 25% compared to the fourth quarter of 2010, and is easily the highest fourth quarter total ever recorded. And again, the number is adjusted for inflation, so the increase represents real growth in the Midland-Odessa economy. For the year, real spending was up by 26% compared to 2010. The 2011 annual total is also some 12% higher than the annual total for 2008, the year spending peaked prior to the onset of recession in 2009.
Real auto spending also moved beyond its pre-recession high point in 2011, and was nearly 40% higher for the year compared to the 2010 annual total. Again, the number represents inflation-adjusted spending on new and used automobiles per motor vehicle sales tax receipts in Midland and Ector counties, so the increases reflected are real increases and represent a true picture over time. Fourth quarter auto spending is also a record, and was over 38% higher compared to the fourth quarter of 2010 (which in turn was up over 40% compared to Q4 of 2009).
Hotel/motel activity in 2011 was up sharply with hotel/motel tax receipts up by over 50% compared to 2010. The expansion in hotel/motel activity is, of course, a function of a growing economy as well as the direct use of local lodging facilities by oil & gas companies.
Construction activity was up sharply as well, with the value of building permits issued by the two cities up by over 40% compared to 2010. The $472 million in permit valuations was the highest on record save for 2001 when a new power plant permit was issued by the city of Odessa for $415 million. The $124 million in permits issued in the fourth quarter was more than double the Q4 2010 total, and is easily the highest fourth quarter total ever recorded.
Home building in Midland-Odessa was an unusually positive story in 2011. In most metro areas, housing construction peaked a number of years ago and has been on a steady decline since then. In Midland-Odessa, however, more new single-family residence permits were issued in 2011 than in any year dating back to at least 1995 (the year we began data collection for the analysis), and likely long before that. The 857 permits issued in 2011 was up by nearly 28% compared to 2010, and the fourth quarter total was up by nearly 50% (year-over-year), and is also the highest fourth quarter total on record.
The number of existing homes sold looks a bit more normal relative to other metro areas and the general trends around the state as a whole. Home sales were up by over 10% in 2011, but were lower compared to 2001, and each year 2003-2008. Closed sales totaled 2,719 in 2011, compared to the peak sales total of 3,440 in 2005.
Pricing of those homes is a different matter, of course. Housing prices continued to increase in 2011, with the annual average up by 6.8% compared to 2010. Even in the recession year of 2009, prices merely flattened (the annual average was down by .3% compared to 2008, a year in which the average price was over 14% higher than the 2007 average). The fourth quarter 2011 average sale price was up by 3% compared to a year ago; both the fourth quarter and annual averages represent nominal (not adjusted for inflation) record price levels.
Employment gains are actually quite modest given the strong totals in other sectors of the economy, namely the oil & gas business, and the strong performance in the spending sector (employment growth and spending growth typically go hand-in-hand). According to the current estimates, total payroll employment in Midland-Odessa is up by some 2.6% at year-end 2011 (an increase of about 3,400 jobs) compared to year-end 2010. For the year as a whole, employment growth was up by 3.6% on average compared to the 2010 annual average. And again, at least according to the current estimates, total payroll employment continues to lag slightly behind peak employment levels established in 2008.
The upcoming employment data revisions may well rectify these discrepancies – these revisions have a history of unpredictability and some odd surprises here and there, but it seems at least fairly likely that employment data estimates for 2010 will be raised when the revised data is released, which would potentially move employment in 2011 beyond any prior period and into record territory where it seems it should be.
The regional rig count in 2011 is of truly historic significance. The current rig count for the three RRC districts that make up the Texas portion of the Permian Basin is high not just relative to 2010, or even 2008, when the rig count peaked as a part of the previous expansion, but also to the benchmark E&P period in the Permian of the early-mid-1980s. Again, the December 1984 rig count (the year of the apparent peak rig count in that period) was 320 for the same geographical region. The rig count for that region surpassed 400 in November, and stands at 404 (the monthly average) for December 2011.
Over 2,500 more original drilling permits were issued in 2011 than in 2008, the prior peak in the number of permits issued, and was up by nearly 30% compared to the 2010 annual total, which in turn was up by over 90% compared to 2009.
Astoundingly, the crude oil production curve has turned around in a big way. The long-term trend has clearly been one of decline. Between 1995 and 2005, crude oil production declined by about 25%. Since then, however, crude oil production has grown by about 12%, including production volume growth of an estimated 5.5% in 2011. In fact, estimated crude oil production in the Texas Permian Basin (RRC districts 7C, 8 and 8A) in 2011 is the highest since 1999
The estimated value of that production – about $26 billion – is also a nominal record, surpassing even 2008 when crude oil prices peaked at a much higher level. The record value in 2011 is a function of higher production in 2011 compared to 2008, and the fact that prices were steadily higher in 2011 compared to 2008 when prices rose rapidly, peaked at over $130/bbl (monthly average) and then dropped rapidly in the latter half of the year.
2011 was simply a great year for the Midland-Odessa economy, and for the regional economy of the Permian Basin. The expansion in the economy and in the business cycle was dramatic; business was better, jobs were added, and the economic pie got much bigger. Again, the final results are not quite in yet due to the employment data revisions yet to come. When the new numbers are released, the various index calculations will be revised accordingly. At that time, we will close out 2011 and offer a general forecast for the balance of 2012.
| Midland, Texas Economic Indicators |
| |
|
|
|
% Change |
|
% Change |
| |
|
2010 |
2011 |
2010-2011 |
2012 |
2011-2012 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| City of Midland |
January |
$ 2,421,849 |
$ 3,296,154 |
36.1% |
$ 3,897,179 |
18.2% |
| Sales Tax Rebate |
February |
$ 3,709,728 |
$ 4,654,346 |
25.5% |
|
|
| |
March |
$ 2,339,418 |
$ 3,081,011 |
31.7% |
|
|
| |
April |
$ 2,557,462 |
$ 2,922,199 |
14.3% |
|
|
| |
May |
$ 3,423,685 |
$ 5,173,110 |
51.1% |
|
|
| |
June |
$ 2,657,740 |
$ 3,618,325 |
36.1% |
|
|
| |
July |
$ 2,739,523 |
$ 3,775,860 |
37.8% |
|
|
| |
August |
$ 3,560,718 |
$ 4,337,808 |
21.8% |
|
|
| |
September |
$ 2,745,810 |
$ 3,499,784 |
27.5% |
|
|
| |
October |
$ 3,145,630 |
$ 3,758,205 |
19.5% |
|
|
| |
November |
$ 3,580,321 |
$ 4,222,797 |
17.9% |
|
|
| |
December |
$ 3,082,857 |
$ 4,004,386 |
29.9% |
|
|
| |
Year-To-Date Total |
$ 35,964,741 |
$ 46,343,985 |
28.9% |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Midland County |
January |
$ 1,424,499 |
$ 2,088,360 |
46.6% |
|
|
| Motor Vehicle Sales Tax |
February |
$ 1,353,104 |
$ 1,727,965 |
27.7% |
|
|
| |
March |
$ 1,879,209 |
$ 2,499,678 |
33.0% |
|
|
| |
April |
$ 1,744,647 |
$ 2,245,929 |
28.7% |
|
|
| |
May |
$ 1,153,354 |
$ 1,618,965 |
40.4% |
|
|
| |
June |
$ 1,830,646 |
$ 2,542,287 |
38.9% |
|
|
| |
July |
$ 1,668,369 |
$ 2,422,370 |
45.2% |
|
|
| |
August |
$ 1,719,533 |
$ 3,056,617 |
77.8% |
|
|
| |
September |
$ 1,848,934 |
$ 3,048,963 |
64.9% |
|
|
| |
October |
$ 1,782,481 |
$ 2,385,677 |
33.8% |
|
|
| |
November |
$ 1,915,477 |
$ 2,505,587 |
30.8% |
|
|
| |
December |
$ 1,663,760 |
$ 2,503,658 |
50.5% |
|
|
| |
YTD Total |
$ 19,984,013 |
$ 28,646,056 |
43.3% |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| City of Midland |
January |
$ 493,161 |
$ 706,666 |
43.3% |
|
|
| Hotel/Motel Tax Receipts |
April |
$ 537,846 |
$ 746,792 |
38.8% |
|
|
| Collected January, April, July and October |
July |
$ 604,101 |
$ 879,753 |
45.6% |
|
|
| for previous quarters ending |
October |
$ 650,628 |
$ 1,027,524 |
57.9% |
|
|
| December, March, June and September |
YTD Total |
$ 2,285,736 |
$ 3,360,735 |
47.0% |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Midland International Airport |
January |
29,764 |
32,787 |
10.2% |
|
|
| Passenger Enplanements |
February |
28,511 |
32,360 |
13.5% |
|
|
| |
March |
35,173 |
39,575 |
12.5% |
|
|
| |
April |
34,837 |
37,117 |
6.5% |
|
|
| |
May |
36,685 |
39,499 |
7.7% |
|
|
| |
June |
40,979 |
42,963 |
4.8% |
|
|
| |
July |
41,504 |
41,904 |
1.0% |
|
|
| |
August |
37,637 |
38,482 |
2.2% |
|
|
| |
September |
37,785 |
39,519 |
4.6% |
|
|
| |
October |
41,601 |
40,503 |
-2.6% |
|
|
| |
November |
37,802 |
40,096 |
6.1% |
|
|
| |
December |
40,265 |
41,548 |
3.2% |
|
|
| |
YTD Total |
442,543 |
466,353 |
5.4% |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| City of Midland |
January |
$ 10,192,393 |
$ 13,142,694 |
28.9% |
|
|
| Building Permit Valuation Total |
February |
$ 21,744,765 |
$ 21,818,980 |
0.3% |
|
|
| |
March |
$ 29,658,712 |
$ 13,711,987 |
-53.8% |
|
|
| |
April |
$ 15,776,395 |
$ 15,799,624 |
0.1% |
|
|
| |
May |
$ 11,820,028 |
$ 26,630,509 |
125.3% |
|
|
| |
June |
$ 8,372,741 |
$ 29,141,321 |
248.0% |
|
|
| |
July |
$ 7,378,269 |
$ 26,068,980 |
253.3% |
|
|
| |
August |
$ 20,581,182 |
$ 50,136,328 |
143.6% |
|
|
| |
September |
$ 5,754,195 |
$ 23,672,313 |
311.4% |
|
|
| |
October |
$ 9,039,844 |
$ 17,532,340 |
93.9% |
|
|
| |
November |
$ 13,474,515 |
$ 21,028,979 |
56.1% |
|
|
| |
December |
$ 15,797,451 |
$ 19,729,164 |
24.9% |
|
|
| |
YTD Total |
$ 169,590,490 |
$ 278,413,219 |
64.2% |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| City of Midland |
January |
30 |
42 |
40.0% |
|
|
| New Single-Family Residence Permits |
February |
32 |
37 |
15.6% |
|
|
| |
March |
51 |
50 |
-2.0% |
|
|
| |
April |
38 |
64 |
68.4% |
|
|
| |
May |
37 |
54 |
45.9% |
|
|
| |
June |
28 |
76 |
171.4% |
|
|
| |
July |
21 |
47 |
123.8% |
|
|
| |
August |
83 |
40 |
-51.8% |
|
|
| |
September |
7 |
44 |
528.6% |
|
|
| |
October |
17 |
42 |
147.1% |
|
|
| |
November |
34 |
45 |
32.4% |
|
|
| |
December |
26 |
25 |
-3.8% |
|
|
| |
YTD Total |
404 |
566 |
40.1% |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Midland |
January |
78 |
91 |
16.7% |
|
|
| Existing Home Sales |
February |
100 |
118 |
18.0% |
|
|
| |
March |
151 |
148 |
-2.0% |
|
|
| |
April |
157 |
167 |
6.4% |
|
|
| |
May |
158 |
177 |
12.0% |
|
|
| |
June |
173 |
154 |
-11.0% |
|
|
| |
July |
131 |
153 |
16.8% |
|
|
| |
August |
132 |
202 |
53.0% |
|
|
| |
September |
117 |
156 |
33.3% |
|
|
| |
October |
106 |
125 |
17.9% |
|
|
| |
November |
108 |
118 |
9.3% |
|
|
| |
December |
115 |
135 |
17.4% |
|
|
| |
YTD Total |
1,526 |
1,744 |
14.3% |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Midland |
January |
$ 190,383 |
$ 201,101 |
5.6% |
|
|
| Average Home Sale Price |
February |
$ 198,800 |
$ 215,685 |
8.5% |
|
|
| |
March |
$ 197,300 |
$ 212,533 |
7.7% |
|
|
| |
April |
$ 186,772 |
$ 162,706 |
-12.9% |
|
|
| |
May |
$ 193,296 |
$ 224,854 |
16.3% |
|
|
| |
June |
$ 202,906 |
$ 219,245 |
8.1% |
|
|
| |
July |
$ 217,524 |
$ 222,313 |
2.2% |
|
|
| |
August |
$ 187,021 |
$ 213,660 |
14.2% |
|
|
| |
September |
$ 209,247 |
$ 217,861 |
4.1% |
|
|
| |
October |
$ 194,183 |
$ 211,487 |
8.9% |
|
|
| |
November |
$ 205,427 |
$ 216,873 |
5.6% |
|
|
| |
December |
$ 210,752 |
$ 207,191 |
-1.7% |
|
|
| |
YTD Average |
$ 199,318 |
$ 210,492 |
5.6% |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Midland |
January |
$ 14,849,835 |
$ 18,300,222 |
23.2% |
|
|
| Home Sales Total Dollar Volume |
February |
$ 19,880,017 |
$ 25,450,885 |
28.0% |
|
|
| |
March |
$ 29,792,288 |
$ 31,454,870 |
5.6% |
|
|
| |
April |
$ 29,323,246 |
$ 27,171,896 |
-7.3% |
|
|
| |
May |
$ 30,540,797 |
$ 39,799,139 |
30.3% |
|
|
| |
June |
$ 35,102,719 |
$ 33,763,761 |
-3.8% |
|
|
| |
July |
$ 28,495,612 |
$ 34,013,830 |
19.4% |
|
|
| |
August |
$ 24,686,787 |
$ 43,159,405 |
74.8% |
|
|
| |
September |
$ 24,481,907 |
$ 33,986,365 |
38.8% |
|
|
| |
October |
$ 20,583,435 |
$ 26,435,872 |
28.4% |
|
|
| |
November |
$ 22,186,144 |
$ 25,590,986 |
15.3% |
|
|
| |
December |
$ 24,236,433 |
$ 27,970,850 |
15.4% |
|
|
| |
YTD Total |
$ 304,159,220 |
$ 367,098,081 |
20.7% |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Midland |
January |
65,000 |
68,500 |
5.4% |
|
|
| Payroll Employment |
February |
66,200 |
69,100 |
4.4% |
|
|
| |
March |
66,700 |
70,200 |
5.2% |
|
|
| |
April |
67,500 |
70,100 |
3.9% |
|
|
| |
May |
68,200 |
69,600 |
2.1% |
|
|
| |
June |
68,500 |
70,100 |
2.3% |
|
|
| |
July |
68,600 |
70,000 |
2.0% |
|
|
| |
August |
68,800 |
70,800 |
2.9% |
|
|
| |
September |
69,100 |
70,800 |
2.5% |
|
|
| |
October |
69,200 |
71,300 |
3.0% |
|
|
| |
November |
69,400 |
70,800 |
2.0% |
|
|
| |
December |
69,700 |
71,800 |
3.0% |
|
|
| |
YTD Average |
68,075 |
70,258 |
3.2% |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Midland |
January |
13,900 |
15,900 |
14.4% |
|
|
| Mining & Construction Employment |
February |
14,200 |
16,000 |
12.7% |
|
|
| (Oil & Gas Employment) |
March |
14,400 |
16,200 |
12.5% |
|
|
| |
April |
14,900 |
16,200 |
8.7% |
|
|
| |
May |
15,100 |
16,300 |
7.9% |
|
|
| |
June |
15,500 |
16,600 |
7.1% |
|
|
| |
July |
15,700 |
16,700 |
6.4% |
|
|
| |
August |
15,800 |
16,800 |
6.3% |
|
|
| |
September |
15,800 |
16,800 |
6.3% |
|
|
| |
October |
15,900 |
16,800 |
5.7% |
|
|
| |
November |
16,000 |
16,800 |
5.0% |
|
|
| |
December |
16,100 |
16,700 |
3.7% |
|
|
| |
YTD Average |
15,275 |
16,483 |
7.9% |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Midland |
January |
6.0 |
5.0 |
-16.7% |
|
|
| Unemployment Rate |
February |
5.7 |
4.8 |
-15.8% |
|
|
| |
March |
5.6 |
4.6 |
-17.9% |
|
|
| |
April |
5.3 |
4.4 |
-17.0% |
|
|
| |
May |
5.2 |
4.6 |
-11.5% |
|
|
| |
June |
5.6 |
5.3 |
-5.4% |
|
|
| |
July |
5.4 |
5.1 |
-5.6% |
|
|
| |
August |
5.3 |
4.8 |
-9.4% |
|
|
| |
September |
5.0 |
4.9 |
-2.0% |
|
|
| |
October |
4.9 |
4.5 |
-8.2% |
|
|
| |
November |
5.0 |
4.1 |
-18.0% |
|
|
| |
December |
4.7 |
3.9 |
-17.0% |
|
|
| |
YTD Average |
5.3 |
4.7 |
-12.1% |
|
|
| Texas Permian Basin Petroleum Index |
| OIL AND GAS INDICATORS |
BASE YEAR |
LAST YEAR |
THIS YEAR |
% Change |
| |
December 1996 |
December 2010 |
December 2011 |
12/10 - 12/11 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Oil Price/bbl (Mo. Avg WTI Crude) |
$ 23.37 |
$ 85.76 |
$ 95.05 |
10.8% |
| Oil Price/bbl (YTD Avg) |
$ 20.43 |
$ 75.96 |
$ 91.45 |
20.4% |
| Gas Price (Waha Hub Mo Avg) * |
$ 3.59 |
$ 4.16 |
$ 3.34 |
-19.7% |
| Gas Price (YTD Avg) |
$ 2.07 |
$ 4.26 |
$ 3.96 |
-7.0% |
| Rig Count (Month) |
89 |
286 |
404 |
41.3% |
| Rig Count (YTD Avg) |
83 |
237 |
355 |
49.8% |
| Drilling Permits (Month |
372 |
764 |
764 |
0.0% |
| Drilling Permits YTD |
4,437 |
8,074 |
10,424 |
29.1% |
| Oil Completions (Month) |
128 |
206 |
410 |
99.0% |
| Oil Completions YTD |
2,401 |
3,556 |
3,516 |
-1.1% |
| Gas Completions (Month) |
49 |
24 |
16 |
-33.3% |
| Gas Completions YTD |
730 |
524 |
171 |
-67.4% |
| Oil Production Volume (000's bbls/month) |
26,860 |
22,738 |
23,525 |
3.5% |
| Oil Production Volume YTD |
329,608 |
267,918 |
282,548 |
5.5% |
| Oil Production Value (000's Month) |
$ 627,718 |
$ 1,949,984 |
$ 2,236,051 |
14.7% |
| Oil Production Value YTD |
$ 6,729,629 |
$ 20,371,405 |
$ 25,834,989 |
26.8% |
| Gas Production Volume (000's MCF/month) |
122,914 |
101,576 |
95,635 |
-5.8% |
| Gas Production Volume YTD |
1,504,801 |
1,259,756 |
1,184,371 |
-6.0% |
| Gas Production Value (000's Month) |
$ 441,261 |
$ 422,555 |
$ 319,422 |
-24.4% |
| Gas Production Value YTD |
$ 3,104,540 |
$ 5,380,893 |
$ 4,683,301 |
-13.0% |
| Oil and Gas Employment (Month) |
17,900 |
28,400 |
29,400 |
3.5% |
| Oil and Gas Employment (Avg YTD) |
17,500 |
26,833 |
29,033 |
8.2% |
| Oil and Gas Regional Stock Index** |
194.5 |
1,790.7 |
1,720.0 |
-3.9% |
| |
|
|
|
|
| INDEX (Base = 100 January 1996) |
111.9 |
250.2 |
281.7 |
12.6% |
| * Courtesy Robert K. Anderson Co. and wellreports.com |
| ** Market Cap. Index based on outstanding shares and END OF MONTH stock prices for: |
| Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. |
| Dawson Geophysical |
| Parallel Petroleum |
| Patterson Energy |